Saturday, April 19, 2014
A show I'd love to see: Gravity's Edge at the Hirschorn
Installation view of Gravity’s Edge at the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, 2014. Left to right: works by Morris Louis, Helen Frankenthaler, Kenneth Noland, Morris Louis, and Morris Louis. Photo: Cathy Carver
February 7 to June 15, 2014 (Lower Level)
Gravity’s Edge presents works made between 1959 and 1978 that signal a shift in approaches to color and abstraction. The installation, drawn from the Hirshhorn’s collection, traces a double trajectory: the exploration of the force of gravity as a determining factor in artistic production and the increasing attention paid to the edge as a compelling aspect of the structure and perception of an artwork.
Moving away from the perceived focus on the inner self associated with Abstract Expressionism in the 1950s, painters Helen Frankenthaler, Morris Louis, and Kenneth Noland gave prominence to and inspired renewed emphasis on materials and processes. Frankenthaler pioneered modes of staining thinned paint directly onto unprimed canvas, which Louis and Noland adopted for their vivid veils and hard-edge stripes. In 1964, art critic Clement Greenberg labeled this development “post-painterly abstraction,” which codified Color Field painting, a style primarily associated with certain figures in New York and the Washington Color School.
This exhibition re-contextualizes the Modernist narrative of Color Field through placing pieces by Frankenthaler, Louis, and Noland together with the lyrical abstractions of Paul Jenkins and Sam Francis, and alongside contemporaneous sculptures by Lynda Benglis and Anne Truitt. These works reveal the extent to which artists of this period used both gravity and edge as a means of challenging the spatial and perceptual limits of art. Rather than reinforce an art historical divide between gestural and geometric abstraction, this installation demonstrates a heightened phenomenological sensibility across media.
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
UES/LES: April Showers Bring May Flowers
Polke at MoMA |
Gorgeous Polke paintings |
Detail |
One of the greats--these purple-black abstractions, and bitumen abstractions, were superb--but photography is not allowed. |
At the Whitney Biennial, Dan Walsh |
Whitney Biennial, Molly Zuckerman-Hartung, best painting by her I've seen: a NO painting |
Sterling Ruby's micro worlds--more Ruby below |
Louise Fishman |
Amy Sillman |
Sillman collaboration with Pam Lins |
Jacqueline Humphries. Someone should do a show of silver paintings, with this, Rosie Keyser, Ryan Sullivan, other artists working with metallics... |
Overview of fourth floor, middle room |
Looking left, and |
Weird painting on right wall summoning 1960s and 70s children's book drawings... |
Laura Owens |
Dona Nelson, a frontrunner |
Ken Lum |
Sarah Charlesworth |
Phil Hansen |
Phil Hansen |
Shio Kusaka |
Zoe Leonard |
Camera obscura with an iPhone |
David Diao |
Diao reminding me of Polke's early works and early Baldessari, too |
Amazing Rebecca Morris |
Slightly reminiscent of Avery |
Rebecca Morris |
Detail |
Elijah Burgher |
Downtown, Laura Sharp Wilson at Valery McKenzie, reviewed by Thomas Micchelli here: http://hyperallergic.com |
Pat Place at Jane Kim |
At Brian Morris, a stunning three-person show with Liz Markus, Judith Linhares and Ashley Garrett |
Garrett |
Linhares |
Markus, Linhares |
Garrett |
Sunday, April 06, 2014
More Matisse: Simon Schama
Simon Schama: how Matisse and Picasso Turned Old Age Into Art
This morning on Facebook, Rising Tide and Pearls From the Ocean filmmaker Robert Adanto posted this link. The discussion of Matisse's aims and goals in particular compel.
One delicious tidbit:
"...his freedom, not just from easel painting, but from the containing edge, the frame, was what Matisse sought from the play of forms he had somehow brought into independent organic life, shapes that embodied the forms of nature, without either laboriously imitating or departing entirely from their visual and tactile presence. So the termini of designed space were joyously over-run; the distinction between figure and ground made ambiguous (especially when Matisse incorporated the discarded shapes from a cut-out into the same composition). He described the correspondence between the play of those shapes and whatever had provoked their visual genesis as a “rapport”; an affinity that he then went on to say was, in fact, love, and “without that love there can no longer be any dependable criteria of observation and therefore no longer any art.”
Another interesting point of discussion is how Matisse (and others, including Picasso himself) considered Picasso a thief of visual ideas. Influence is tricky; how edifying to read about it so long ago.
More about the cutouts:Matisse website
This morning on Facebook, Rising Tide and Pearls From the Ocean filmmaker Robert Adanto posted this link. The discussion of Matisse's aims and goals in particular compel.
One delicious tidbit:
"...his freedom, not just from easel painting, but from the containing edge, the frame, was what Matisse sought from the play of forms he had somehow brought into independent organic life, shapes that embodied the forms of nature, without either laboriously imitating or departing entirely from their visual and tactile presence. So the termini of designed space were joyously over-run; the distinction between figure and ground made ambiguous (especially when Matisse incorporated the discarded shapes from a cut-out into the same composition). He described the correspondence between the play of those shapes and whatever had provoked their visual genesis as a “rapport”; an affinity that he then went on to say was, in fact, love, and “without that love there can no longer be any dependable criteria of observation and therefore no longer any art.”
Another interesting point of discussion is how Matisse (and others, including Picasso himself) considered Picasso a thief of visual ideas. Influence is tricky; how edifying to read about it so long ago.
Matisse in action |
The Circus (Jazz) 1943 |